Australia, the movie: by way of Pearl Harbour, John Wayne, the Australian Tourism Commission (and Baz Luhrmann)

I’m writing this hiding in the bathroom from my partner, with whom I’ve just seen Australia, the movie. She liked it and thinks I need to disclose that I don’t like mangoes, vegemite and other Australian sacred objects.

This film had everything:

  • an aborginal noting in the end that Australia was for for ‘all of us’ (white and black) with a footnote about an apology in 2008 for the stolen generation
  • a lead male character referred to only through the film as ‘the drover’ (gosh do you think  they’re arguing that he is the quintessential embodiment of those heroes of the open plains) – I nearly choked on my popcorn when as Hugh and Co dragged the children away from ‘Mission Island’ where they had been trapped by the evil clergy the heroic aboriginal brother in law tells him “Drover you’ve got to take that mob of children home…” 
  • continual ersatz symbolism throughout the film targeting American movie-goers (let’s face it you’re not going to earn back your $150m+ budget just from Australians): the ‘Wizard of Oz’ theme tune,  John Wayne style river crossings, and let’s not forget homage to Pearl Harbour in the climactic bombing of Darwin by the evil Japanese
  • slo-mo shots of Hugh Jackman soaping his torso under the stars and rather cruel extended closeups of Nicole Kidman (tough on the 40+ generation)

All of this rendered in CGI-led hyper-realism and panoramic landscapes oddly reminiscent of Northern Territory tourism promotional videos (especially funny if you know the Kimberly region as they leaped from tourist spot to tourist spot).

Finally, just in case the above seems rather unbalanced, verging on un-patriotic, Nullah the kid was good and the score was good too.

Another one, where you suspect that there is one guy behind it, who has become so successful that nobody around them is being honest any longer.

Geez Baz, you needed an editor: 4 individuals in the script credits were clearly not enough.

Posted under Cliche watch

This post was written by mike on December 3, 2008

Tags: , , , ,

At the end of the day it’s a perfect storm

The mysteries of cultural transmission are propelling “perfect storm” up the cliche charts at the moment. Presumably Mr Clooney and the 2000 movie of the same name is at least partially to blame but it’s interesting how 8 years later it suddenly seems to be catching on.

Whilst nowhere near as popular as the teeth-grating conversation-stopper “at the end of the day” (17.4m mentions in Google) “perfect storm” is still clocking in a quite respectable 3.5m Google results.

To put this into perspective “in the final analysis” only registers 1.5m times.

“Perfect storm” is already being nicely mangled in things I’ve been reading “because … like ‘perfect’ means ‘good’ doesn’t it?” So, I read some corporate guru talking the other day about how for his commodity supply company there was a ‘perfect storm’ of influences coming together to increase sales to China…

I don’t know whether it’s my monocle getting in the way or something but it is interesting how a lot of these phrases are kind of conversation-terminators.

The original meaning of ‘perfect storm’ of course was talking about a freak-convergence of various totally unpredictable factors coming together – “I mean, it’s not as if I could predict any of this credit crunch fallout, it was a ‘perfect storm’.”

And likewise it’s not as if I expect you to respond to my summing up because once the day has ended it’s like-kinda finished you know? Just as my analysis is ‘final’.

Posted under Hate pets

This post was written by mike on September 1, 2008

Tags: ,